Treatment at ICPM: Lip Lift in Valencia

In short

  • 🔑 A constitutionally long philtrum exists and has nothing to do with age. It is inherited, it shows from adolescence and it does not change over time. Clinically it is the same anatomical situation as the acquired kind.
  • The difference is not in the measurement: it is in the history. At sixty it is about recovering something you had; at twenty, about altering something that was always there.
  • ⚠️ And that changes the conversation, not the technique.
  • 🔑 On social media, the research is more nuanced than the easy headline suggests. A randomised experiment with 299 women found no significant differences in interest in cosmetic surgery between those who watched idealised content and those who watched travel videos.
  • What that same study did find: idealised content — filtered or not — was associated with more negative affect, and unfiltered content with lower facial satisfaction. Filtered and unfiltered did not differ from each other.
  • And in another study, the strongest predictors of accepting cosmetic surgery were not social media: they were having already had a procedure and knowing someone who had.
  • 🚨 What does not change with age: the scar is permanent and lifting too much cannot be undone. At twenty-five, that means sixty years ahead with that decision.
  • It is done here at this age, with 18 as the minimum and an individual assessment that looks at personal factors, proportions, the harmony of the whole and whether the expectation is realistic. No questionnaire is used: the person is assessed.

Someone in their twenties asking about a lip lift prompts two automatic reactions, and both are lazy: assuming it is a passing fad, and assuming it is the same as in someone of sixty.

Neither. There is a perfectly sound anatomical reason for having a long upper lip at twenty, and there are reasons for having a longer conversation than usual before operating.

The constitutionally long philtrum

It exists, it is common and it is not an exaggerated perception.

Just as the shape of the nose or the proportion of the chin is inherited, so is the length of the stretch between the base of the nose and the lip. Anyone with a long one has had it all along: they notice it in photographs from adolescence, no tooth has shown when they talk since they were young and they usually describe it as “there is a lot of space between my nose and my mouth”.

Anatomically it is the same situation as the one ageing produces: a covering of skin longer than that face calls for. The systematic review that brought together the seven available studies included adult patients from the age of 18 operated on for aesthetic or aesthetic-functional indications, with no upper age restriction.

🔑 In other words: youth is not in itself a contraindication. What there is is an anatomy, and anatomy does not check your date of birth.

A long lip can be long for two different reasonsTwo stacked horizontal bands. The upper one, in purple, corresponds to the constitutional cause and carries on the right a straight line labelled stable over time. The lower one, in a reddish tone, corresponds to the acquired cause and carries a line that descends progressively, labelled changes over the years.A long lip can be long for two different reasonsThe measurement does not tell them apart; the history doesConstitutionalIt has been there since adolescence and does not change. The proportion has always beenwhat it is; nothing has happened, it is your face.stable over timeAcquiredIt appears little by little. The photograph from twenty years ago shows a different proportion, andthat difference is all the clinical history needed.changes over the yearsThe resulting anatomy can be identical: same philtrum, same tooth at rest. What changes is not the measurement, it is thehistory — and that is why the first question at a consultation at thirty is “since when?” and not “how long is it?”.A simplified diagram for explanatory purposes; it does not reproduce real anatomical proportions.
Two people with exactly the same philtrum can be in different clinical situations. If the lip has always been like that, it is constitutional: nothing has happened, it is a proportion, and the decision is purely aesthetic. If it was not like that before, it is acquired, and it is part of a process that is going to continue. That changes the conversation: in the first case it is worth asking why it bothers you now and not before; in the second, what else is going to change. The measurement does not distinguish the two cases — the old photograph does, and at a consultation at thirty it is worth more than any table. Diagram produced by the Instituto de Cirugía Plástica del Mediterráneo.

What does change at twenty

Not the technique. The conversation.

1. The horizon is longer. Excised skin does not come back and the scar is permanent. At twenty-five, that means living with the decision for decades — and also that later ageing will act on an already shortened lip. It is a fact to have on the table, not an obstacle.

2. The reference is different. At sixty you can compare with your own photographs from twenty years ago, which is the most informative comparison there is. At twenty there is no such “before”: the reference is an idea, not a memory. That makes it more important that the expectation is properly calibrated.

3. The scale of the change surprises people more. This surgery moves two or three millimetres. Anyone arriving expecting a different face will be disappointed, and that risk is greater when the reference is somebody else’s image. It is covered in results and duration.

What the research says about social media and surgery

Here it is worth being precise, because it is a field where a great deal is asserted and little is measured.

A randomised experiment (2026). 299 women aged 18 to 83 were randomly assigned to watch idealised TikTok videos with a filter, idealised without a filter, or travel videos as a control. Results:

  • Those who watched the travel videos reported less negative affect than those in the two idealised conditions.
  • Those who watched idealised content without a filter — not the filtered group — reported lower facial satisfaction than the control group.
  • 🔑 There were no significant differences between any of the conditions in body satisfaction or in interest in cosmetic surgery.
  • Filtered and unfiltered did not differ from each other, suggesting that viewing idealised content in any form may have similar effects.

A correlational study (2026) in young women aged 18 to 30 found that time spent on TikTok and the number of comments about appearance were associated with body image. But when it looked at what predicted acceptance of cosmetic surgery, the significant factors were different: having already had a procedure and having someone close who had had one.

⚠️ How this has to be read, without taking more from it than is there: these are studies of attitudes in general, not about the lip lift or about patients arriving at a consultation. And the first is a brief laboratory experiment, not a measure of prolonged exposure.

🔑 What can honestly be said: the relationship between what is seen on social media and what ends up being operated on is less direct than the headline suggests, and the social factor — the people around you — weighs at least as much. This page is not going to moralise about it, not least because the data do not support doing so.

What the research says about social media and surgeryThree cards in a row. The first sets out what was found, the second what was not, and the third, picked out with a thicker border, the two significant predictors.What the research says about social media and surgeryWhat was found, what was not, and what did predictWhat has been foundAn association between time of use,comments about appearance andpoorer bodyimage.association, not causeWhat has NOT been foundA randomised trial with 299women found no difference ininterest in cosmetic surgerybetween those who watchedidealised content and those who watchedtravel videos.299 women · randomisedWhat did predict itHaving already had someprocedure.Knowing someone who had hadone.the two significant predictorsThe people around you weighed more than the algorithm. It is an uncomfortable result for the usual narrative, which is why it is worthpublishing: what pushes people towards surgery is not what they see on a screen, it is what they see across a table.A simplified diagram for explanatory purposes; it does not reproduce real anatomical proportions.
The usual narrative says social media pushes people into surgery, and the research is more nuanced. There is an association between time of use, comments about appearance and poorer body image — association, not cause. But when it was put to the test in a randomised trial, showing idealised content did not increase interest in cosmetic surgery compared with showing travel videos. What did predict that interest was far more down to earth: having already had something done or knowing someone who had. That is, the people around you weighed more than the screen. Diagram produced by the Instituto de Cirugía Plástica del Mediterráneo.

What a serious consultation should ask you

Whatever your age, and all the more so if you are young:

  • What exactly is it that bothers you? If the answer is “I want lips like the ones in that photograph”, the ground is slippery. If it is “no tooth shows at all when I talk and it has always been like that”, it is an anatomical description.
  • Since when? A constitutional feature has been there all your life. A discomfort that appeared three weeks ago is another matter.
  • Have you thought about a scar being visible for months in the middle of your face? It is covered in the lip lift scar.
  • What do you expect to change in your life? The honest answer should be “not much”: it is a surgery of two or three millimetres.
  • Has anyone ever told you no? A practice that never advises against anything is not a practice.

🔑 And a recommendation no clinic makes and that is the most sensible one for this profile: there is no hurry at all. An irreversible decision is not improved by being taken quickly. If a centre pressures you with deadlines, offers or limited availability, that is the most useful information you will get from it.

Book an appointment

You can book your own appointment. Pick the day and time from the free slots in the diary, in a panel that opens right here, without leaving this page.

Book an appointment

Frequently asked questions

Is there a minimum age?

18, which is also the minimum age in the standard systematic review. There is no stricter in-house age criterion: what decides is not the years but the assessment, and in someone young that assessment weighs more, not less.

Is it better to wait until I am older?

There is no general answer. A constitutionally long philtrum is not going to improve by waiting, and later ageing will happen anyway. What does improve with time is the certainty that the decision is yours and not a season’s.

Will it show more because I am young?

What shows is disproportion, not age. An upper lip that is too short draws attention at any age — and at twenty there are more years for it to draw attention in.

My friends have had things done and I have not. Does that have an influence?

According to the study cited, yes, and a considerable one: having someone close who has had a procedure was one of the significant predictors of accepting cosmetic surgery. That is not a judgement: it is information about where the impulse comes from, and knowing it helps you decide more calmly.

And if I regret it?

It is the risk specific to this profile. What can and cannot be corrected is in a badly done lip lift and revision surgery, and the summary is uncomfortable: the scar can be treated; having lifted too much cannot.

Sources

  • Komisarek O, Banasiak Ł, Olichwer V, Burduk P. The Bullhorn and Beyond: Evidence-Based Review and Clinical Recommendations for Lip Lift Techniques. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2026. PMID 41731334. — PRISMA 2020 systematic review; the included studies comprised adult patients aged 18 or over undergoing a lip lift for aesthetic or aesthetic-functional indications; elongation of the philtrum is among the age-related changes, and patient selection remains unstandardised.
  • Harriger JA, Brown SA, Chung HG, Trammell JP. Effects of filtered vs. unfiltered TikTok videos on mood, body and facial satisfaction, and cosmetic surgery interest. Body Image, 2026. PMID 41564550. — 299 adult women aged 18 to 83 randomly assigned to watch unfiltered idealised videos, filtered idealised videos or travel videos; the control group reported less negative affect than the two idealised conditions; the unfiltered condition, but not the filtered one, was associated with lower facial satisfaction compared with control; there were no significant differences between any condition in body satisfaction or in interest in cosmetic surgery; the filtered and unfiltered conditions did not differ from each other, suggesting that viewing idealised content in any form may have similar effects; age moderated the effect on mood; the authors recommend further work in this area.
  • Arikan B, Cillimoglu SN, Parmak B. The relationship between TikTok use, body image, and attitudes toward cosmetic surgery among young adult women: A cross-sectional study. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 2026. PMID 41956575. — Descriptive, correlational study in young women aged 18 to 30; the number of comments about appearance on TikTok and the duration of use proved to be determinants of body image, while the significant predictors of acceptance of cosmetic surgery were a history of having had a procedure and having an acquaintance who had had one; the authors recommend psychological screening and counselling before the procedure to support realistic expectations and informed decisions.

Book your consultation

If you are in your twenties and have spent a while looking at that stretch of your face, the first step is not surgery: it is finding out whether what you have really is a long philtrum and how many millimetres of margin there would be. An in-person assessment answers that, and nothing has to be decided that day — or that month.

Clinical confirmation by the surgeon

Portrait of Elena García Vilariño
Dr Elena García Vilariño
Specialist in Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery
Registration no. 46/4624503
Portrait of Abel Llinás Porte
Dr Abel Llinás Porte
Specialist in Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery
Registration no. 46/4623604
Portrait of Enrique Salmerón González
Dr Enrique Salmerón González
Specialist in Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery
Registration no. 46/4624077

Last reviewed: 6 September 2026. This content is for information only and does not replace an individual assessment by a healthcare professional.

You may also be interested in …

Three fine surgical instruments – forceps, needle holder and small scissors – lined up in parallel on a sterile drape.
Lip Lift Variants: Italian, Corner and Others

Lip Lift Variants: Italian, Corner and Others

Close-up of the base of the nose and the upper lip, with intact skin and no marks or scars.
The Subnasal (Bullhorn) Technique

The Subnasal (Bullhorn) Technique

A stapled multi-page document lying on a table, with a pen on top and illegible text.
Lip Lift Risks and Complications

Lip Lift Risks and Complications

An open paper diary with an empty grid of days and an unlabelled tube of cream on top.
Lip Lift Recovery

Lip Lift Recovery

Hands of a professional in white-coat sleeves pointing to three different spots on the consulting-room desk.
Cheiloplasty, Lip Lift and Lip Lifting

Cheiloplasty, Lip Lift and Lip Lifting

Overhead view of a fine-needle syringe on the left and a surgical marker on the right, separated by an empty space.
Lip Lift or Hyaluronic Acid?

Lip Lift or Hyaluronic Acid?

Book a consultation

ICPM · Contact WhatsApp (EN)

By sending this form you accept our privacy policy. We will only use your details to answer your enquiry.

BOOK A CONSULTATION
PHONE
WHATSAPP
ASK A QUESTION