In short
- The mons pubis is suspended from the abdominal wall, and when what holds it gives way, it descends.
- A descended pubis is not the same as one with excess fat: one is corrected by lifting and the other by reducing.
- 🔑 It is done in the same operation as the abdominal surgery when that is indicated, using the same incision and with no additional scar.
- What has been published on outcomes is consistent and favourable, and most of it comes from women after major weight loss, not after a caesarean.
- The improvements described are not only aesthetic: hygiene of the area, being able to see the genitals and sexual life all appear in the series.
- ⚠️ Why the pubis descends after a caesarean has been published; correcting it by lifting has not. The article describing the mechanism stops at abdominoplasty and does not go as far as proposing this manoeuvre: lifting the pubis is this practice’s own criterion, supported by that same pathophysiology.
- It is decided by examination, measuring where the tissue is relative to where it should be, not from a photograph.
The pubic lift — or monsplasty — consists of removing the excess tissue of the mons pubis and resuspending it in its position. It is indicated when the pubis has descended, which happens after major weight loss and also, by a different mechanism, after a caesarean.
And it is usually proposed in the same operation as the abdominal surgery, not as a second one. The reason is easy to verify: if you tighten the upper half and leave the lower one where it is, the contrast between the two becomes more visible, not less.
This page sets out the manoeuvre that completes the ladder described in how the surgery is decided.
Why the pubis descends
There are two different routes leading to the same place.
After major weight loss, the tissue of the mons pubis is left with excess skin and without the support it had, and it descends. It is the situation in which this surgery has been studied most.
After a caesarean, the mechanism is different and has been described precisely: with Scarpa’s fascia left unclosed, its edges retract; the lower edge does so downwards, dragging the mons pubis with it (Pelosi, 2026). It is the same movement that, at the upper edge, produces the shelf over the scar.
🔑 So, in the sequelae of a caesarean, a dropped pubis is not a separate problem: it comes from the same layer as the apron and the depressed scar. It is set out in the page on a drooping pubis after a caesarean.
Lifting or reducing: not the same thing
It is the distinction that decides the indication, and at a glance the two pictures look alike.
| Descended pubis | Pubis with excess fat | |
|---|---|---|
| What is happening | The tissue is lower than it used to be | There is more volume in the same place |
| What corrects it | Lifting and resuspending | Reducing the volume |
| If they are confused | Reducing leaves it just as low and emptier | Lifting leaves the volume where it was |
⚠️ And very often both are present, so the assessment is not “one or the other”: it is how much there is of each. It is checked by examination standing and lying down, seeing where the upper border of the pubis sits relative to the scar and to the symphysis.
What is done
The excess tissue is removed and the mons pubis is resuspended in its position, fixing it to the deep plane so that the result does not depend on the skin alone.
When it goes with abdominal surgery, it is done through the same incision: there is no new scar and the old caesarean scar is excised as part of the procedure.
If there is excess fat as well, reducing it can be combined in the same manoeuvre. As elsewhere in this cluster, it is combined when there is fat worth improving, not as a matter of course. When all there is is excess volume and the tissue is in its place, the procedure is another one: reduction of the mons pubis, which at the centre is carried out within female intimate surgery.
Why in the same operation
It is the question asked most often, and it has two answers.
The first is about the result. The abdomen and the pubis are seen together. Correcting the wall and leaving the pubis descended produces a new step between the two areas, and that contrast is perceived more than the original problem.
The second is practical. By using the same incision and the same anaesthetic, no new scar and no second recovery are added.
⚠️ That it is proposed in the same operation does not mean it is always done. It is indicated when the pubis has descended; if it is in its place, it is not touched.
What has been measured, and in whom
Here it is worth being precise, because the quality of the evidence is not the same as that of the mechanism.
What has been published on outcomes comes almost entirely from women after major weight loss:
- A prospective study of 25 patients with grade 2 or higher pubic ptosis found significant improvement in body image (p < 0.001), satisfaction with the abdomen (p < 0.001) and sexual function (p = 0.009), with reported functional improvements in being able to see the genitals (36%), hygiene of the area (32%), sexual life (48%), genital sensation (24%) and urinary continence (4%). No major complications, and with an additional retrospective series of 80 patients followed for a mean of 18 months (Hamdi, 2023).
- A one-year prospective study in 23 women after bariatric surgery documented a mean improvement of 10.08 points on the Rosenberg self-esteem scale and proposed a decision algorithm according to the grade of the deformity (Pechevy, 2016).
⚠️ The distance from our case has to be stated: there is no published series measuring the outcome of a pubic lift for caesarean sequelae. It is reasonable to expect similar behaviour — the tissue and the manoeuvre are the same — but that is a founded expectation, not a datum.
🔑 And a point about who the criterion belongs to. The article describing the descent of the pubis after a caesarean does not propose this manoeuvre: it describes the mechanism and its recommendation stops at abdominoplasty with plication. That the pubis is also corrected here is this practice’s criterion, with that pathophysiology as support. Putting it otherwise would attribute to the source something it does not say.
Risks
Those of contour surgery in the area, and in the context in which it is usually done — associated with abdominal surgery — they add to those of that surgery:
- Seroma, the most frequent complication of abdominal contour surgery: in abdominoplasty, from 19.5% without preventive measures to 7.5% with them (Seretis, 2017).
- Healing problems, more likely in smokers.
- Haematoma and infection, uncommon.
- Altered sensation in the area, usually temporary.
- Asymmetry or insufficient correction, which is the specific risk of a manoeuvre that repositions tissue.
In the prospective series cited there were no major complications, with one dehiscence and three seromas in another prospective trial in the same field. The specific risks in a given case depend on the extent and are explained in the consultation.
The timings afterwards
The timings worked to. Walking from the day of surgery — early walking is what prevents thrombosis, which is why it is insisted on — suture removal and return to driving at two weeks, the gym at a month starting gradually and abdominal exertion from two months. The medication is a painkiller, prophylactic antibiotics in some cases and heparin according to each patient’s risk factors. ⚠️ These are the general timings: yours are given by your surgeon at the review appointment. How to organise it if there are small children at home is in recovery with small children.
Book an appointment
You can book your own appointment. Pick the day and time from the free slots in the diary, in a panel that opens right here, without leaving this page.
Frequently asked questions
Can the pubic lift be done on its own?
Yes, and it is done, in two situations: when there is descent of the pubis and the abdomen has nothing to correct, and when the patient expressly prefers not to have the abdomen operated on. The usual thing, when there is an abdominal indication, is to do it in the same operation: the same incision is used and the contrast between the two areas is avoided.
Does it leave a new scar?
When it goes with the abdominal surgery, no: the work is done through the incision that is going to be made anyway, and the caesarean scar is excised as part of the procedure.
Is the difference very noticeable?
The published series describe consistent improvements both in satisfaction and in functional aspects — hygiene, being able to see the genitals, sexual life — although in patients operated on after major weight loss. There are no data specific to caesarean sequelae.
Is it the same as taking fat off the pubis?
No. Reducing volume and lifting descended tissue are different manoeuvres and they solve different problems. Confusing them leaves an unconvincing result, which is why the examination first distinguishes which of the two there is.
Does it affect sensation?
There can be temporary altered sensation in the area, as in any surgery that lifts tissue. In the most recent series, some of the patients reported improved genital sensation after the correction.
How much does it cost?
Done on its own, around €4,000-5,000, and it is quoted case by case after the assessment. When it goes with abdominal surgery it is not added separately: it is part of the procedure, because it is done through the same incision and in the same operation.
How long do I have to wait after the caesarean?
At least six months, the same as for the other steps, because the wall goes on changing during that time.
Sources
- Pelosi MA 2nd, Pelosi MA 3rd, Romero R. The cesarean apron: description, proposed pathophysiology, classification, and prevention through Scarpa fascia closure at cesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2026;233(6S):S118-S128. PMID 41485815 — It describes the downward retraction of the lower fascial edge and the descent of the mons pubis after a caesarean, which is the mechanism that justifies this manoeuvre. Its treatment recommendation stops at abdominoplasty with plication and does not propose the pubic lift, and this page says so expressly. Verified on 29-08-2026.
- Hamdi M, Waked K, Deleuze J, Giunta G, De Baerdemaeker R, De Brucker B, Zeltzer A. The monsplasty: Surgical and functional outcomes using an effective and reproducible surgical technique. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2023;84:287-294. PMID 37385140 — Prospective study of 25 patients with grade ≥2 ptosis plus a retrospective series of 80 with a mean follow-up of 18 months. Significant improvement in body image, abdominal satisfaction and sexual function, with functional improvements in being able to see the genitals (36%), hygiene (32%), sexual life (48%), genital sensation (24%) and continence (4%). No major complications. Level of evidence II. The population is not a caesarean one. Verified on 29-08-2026.
- Pechevy L, Gourari A, Carloni R, Sauvaget F, Bertheuil N, Goga D. Monsplasty after massive weight loss: assessment of its aesthetic and functional impact. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthétique. 2016;61(1):e21-35. PMID 25572166 — One-year prospective study in 23 women after major weight loss, with a mean improvement of 10.08 points on the Rosenberg self-esteem scale and a decision algorithm by grade. It confirms that the available evidence comes from a different indication. Verified on 29-08-2026.
- Seretis K, Goulis D, Demiri EC, Lykoudis EG. Prevention of seroma formation following abdominoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2017;37(3):316-323. PMID 28158391 — Nine studies and 664 patients: seroma in 19.5% of controls against 7.5% with preventive measures. It provides the risk of the context in which this manoeuvre is usually performed, which is associated with abdominal surgery. Verified on 29-08-2026.
Book your consultation
If you have noticed that the pubis has changed position and you do not know whether what is there is dropped tissue or volume, that is what an examination settles. Out of it comes whether lifting, reducing, both or neither applies — and whether it makes sense to do it together with another operation or separately.
Clinical confirmation by the surgeon
Registration no. 46/4624077
Registration no. 46/4624503
Last reviewed: 6 September 2026. This content is for information only and does not replace an individual assessment by a healthcare professional.
